Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5843/2026 of GAYASUDDIN Vs THE STATE NCT DELHI AND ANR on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010368262026 + CRL.M.C. 5843/2026, CRL.M.A. 24378-80/2026 GAYASUDDIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Hegde, Mr. Ajaz Ahmad and Md. Ameer Hamza, Advocates. versus THE STATE NCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through:

CRL.M.C. 5843/2026

$~102

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010368262026

+

CRL.M.C. 5843/2026, CRL.M.A. 24378-80/2026

GAYASUDDIN

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Vikram

Hegde,

Mr.

Ajaz

Ahmad and Md. Ameer Hamza,

Advocates.

versus

THE STATE NCT DELHI AND ANR

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.

WSI Vandna and SI Vikender.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 11.08.2026

1. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 167/2025, registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar under Sections 69, 123, 89, 79, 351 and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Vikram Hegde, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the learned Trial Court.

3. Mr. Hegde, however, seeks expedition of the proceedings before the learned Trial Court, submitting that, according to him, only the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:09:18

CRL.M.C. 5843/2026

prosecutrix has been examined and that she has not supported the prosecution’s case. He states that 20 other witnesses are yet to be examined. Insofar as this aspect is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to seek expedition of the proceedings before the learned Trial Court. The learned Trial Court is requested to consider such request in accordance with its Board and the age of the matters pending before it.

4. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, submits that the prosecution shall cooperate in the said process.

5. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission.

6. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on any application that may be filed by the petitioner hereafter, which shall be considered by the appropriate Court on its own merits, in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 11, 2026 SS/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:09:18

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead