Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./2142/2026 of ANKUR RAWAT & ANR. Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 7 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2142/2026 & 2296/2026 Page 1 of 4 pages $~31& 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 07.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010111482026 + CRL.M.C. 2142/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8841/2026 ANKUR RAWAT & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dushyant Pratap Singh and Mr. Vikram

$~31& 32

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 07.08.2026

CNR No. DLHC010111482026

+

CRL.M.C. 2142/2026 & CRL.M.A. 8841/2026

ANKUR RAWAT & ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Dushyant Pratap Singh and Mr.

Vikram Pratap Singh, Advocates with

petitioners in person.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State

(through videoconferencing) with SI

Roshan Lal, HC Navesh and HC

Babu Lal, PS Sarita Vihar.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CNR No. DLHC010118092026

+

CRL.M.C. 2296/2026, CRL.M.A. 24038/2026 & CRL.M.A.

9366/2026

PURUSHOTEM CHADHA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Petitioner in person.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State

(through videoconferencing) with SI

GIRISH

KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec

45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA

Date: 2026.08.07 17:16:37 +05'30'

Roshan Lal, HC Navesh and HC

Babu Lal, PS Sarita Vihar.

Mr. Dushyant Pratap Singh and Mr.

Vikram Pratap Singh, Advocates with

R-2 and R-3 in person.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. These two petitions seek quashing of cross-FIRs, bearing no. 43/2026 and 24/2026, both registered by PS Sarita Vihar for offences under Section 115(2)/126(2)/351(2)/3(5) BNS. The quashings have been sought on the basis of compromise executed between the parties.

2. In furtherance of order dated 11.05.2026 passed in CRL.M.C. 2296/2026, the petitioner of that case filed CRL.M.A. 24038/2026 seeking to implead Mr. Amit Chadha as a party. The application is allowed and amended memo of parties dated 17.07.2026 is taken on record.

3. Learned APP for State submits that in view of nature of offence, some deterrent cost may be imposed on the petitioners and beyond that State has no objection. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,

Date: 2026.08.07 17:16:28 +05'30'

4. The private parties present today in court affirm that they have settled all their disputes and do not wish to continue the prosecution of the subject FIRs.

5. Having spoken with the private parties in Court, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. However, keeping in mind it to be a case of road rage, which can assume dangerous proportions and at times even fatal ramifications, I also find substance in the contention of prosecution side that some deterrent measure must be taken against the private parties so that they never resort to such violence ever in future.

6. In view of above circumstances, both these petitions are allowed and the subject FIRs No.43/2026 and 24/2026 of Police Station Sarita Vihar for offences under Section 115(2)/126(2)/351(2)/3(5) BNS and proceedings arising out of the same are quashed subject to each of the petitioners of these petitions depositing costs of Rs. 20,000/- online with www.bharatkeveer.gov.in within one week. The costs receipts shall be filed by each of the petitioners before the trial court where matter is stated to be already listed on 30.09.2026.

7. Copy of this order be sent to the trial court making it clear that if the above said cost is not deposited and the cost receipt is not filed, the trial against the defaulting petitioners/accused persons shall continue. GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,

Date: 2026.08.07 17:16:19 +05'30'

8. Accompanying applications also stand disposed of.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 07, 2026/dr GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,

Date: 2026.08.07 17:16:07 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead