Delhi High Court
RFA(COMM)/11/2026 of M/S PDG TYRES INDIA PVT LTD. Vs M/S WHEELS DECOR on 6 August 2026
11/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010001952026 + RFA(COMM) 11/2026, CM APPLs. 1151/2026, 1152/2026, 1153/2026, 1154/2026 & 1155/2026 M/S PDG TYRES INDIA PVT LTD. .....Appellant Through: None versus M/S WHEELS DECOR .....Respondent Through: Mr.
RFA(COMM) 11/2026
$~2
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010001952026
+
RFA(COMM) 11/2026, CM APPLs. 1151/2026, 1152/2026, 1153/2026, 1154/2026 & 1155/2026
M/S PDG TYRES INDIA PVT LTD.
.....Appellant
Through:
None
versus
M/S WHEELS DECOR
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. S. Satyanarayana and Mr.
Pratyaksh Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
ORDER (ORAL)
%
06.08.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the amount covered by the impugned judgment and decree stands paid to the appellant in execution proceedings and that, therefore, the appeal has been rendered infructuous.
2. We note that there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant on 23 February 2026, 10 March 2026 and on 13 April 2026.
3. None appears for the appellant today either.
4. It appears that the appellant is not appearing as the dispute
RFA(COMM) 11/2026
stands settled.
5. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent, therefore, it does not appear that any lis survive for adjudication in the present appeal which is accordingly disposed of.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
AUGUST 6, 2026/aky