Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./1799/2026 of RAHUL Vs THE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1799/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010204702026 + BAIL APPLN. 1799/2026 RAHUL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sujit Kumar & Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with

$~6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010204702026

+

BAIL APPLN. 1799/2026

RAHUL

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Sujit Kumar & Mr. Rohit

Singh, Advocates.

versus

THE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP

with

Mr.

Narendra

Kumar,

Advocate.

Insp. Devendr Kumar, ATO/SP

Badli

Mr. G.L. Meena, Mr. Mitunjay,

Mr.

Hazari

Lal,

Mr.

Rajeev

Kokcha & Ms. Suriya Prakash,

Advocates for Complainant.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 06.08.2026

1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 968/2023, dated 23.11.2023, lodged at Police Station Samaipur Badli, Delhi, under Sections 279/304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Sujit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application. However, he requests that the Trial Court be directed to expedite the proceedings. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:08:11

3. The Trial Court is requested to consider the applicant’s request for expeditious disposal of proceedings, having regard to its own Board and age of matters pending before it.

4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties in any future application are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 6, 2026 ‘pv’/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:08:11

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead