Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/2335/2026 of RUSTOM Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) on 5 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010355582026 + W.P.(CRL) 2335/2026 RUSTOM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonam Tomar, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Inspector Mahesh Kumar Bhargava CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O

$~76

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010355582026

+

W.P.(CRL) 2335/2026

RUSTOM

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Sonam Tomar, Advocate

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Inspector

Mahesh Kumar Bhargava

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

05.08.2026

CRL.M.A. 23619/2026 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 2335/2026

2. Petitioner seeks issuance of writ directing the respondent to release the petitioner on parole for a period of six weeks in order to enable him to participate in IVF treatment of his wife.

3. But on being pointed out that till date, petitioner has not filed any representation for parole before the competent authority, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the request that the present petition may be treated as representation.

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2026 at 13:17:38

4. Learned ASC also submits that the respondent is ready to treat the present petition as representation.

5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn directing the respondent to treat this petition as representation of petitioner for being released on parole. The representation shall be decided within four weeks. In case, the representation is not decided within four weeks, the petitioner shall have liberty to file fresh petition.

6. Copy of this order along with the petition be sent to the Jail Superintendent for compliance.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J AUGUST 5, 2026/as

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2026 at 13:17:38

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead