Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2088/2026 of DINESH SAH Vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI on 5 August 2026
2088/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010247942026 + BAIL APPLN. 2088/2026 DINESH SAH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with Mr. Narendra Kumar,
BAIL APPLN. 2088/2026 Page 1 of 2
$~17
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010247942026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2088/2026
DINESH SAH
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP
with
Mr.
Narendra
Kumar,
Advocate.
Mr. Sarthak Karol, Ms. Neelakshi
Bhadauria
and
Mr.
Shashank
Sharma,
Advocates
for
complainant.
SI Yashpal Singh.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
05.08.2026
1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 1043/2025 dated 04.11.2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District North, Delhi, under Sections 306/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, states, at the outset, that after the filing of the present application, charges have been framed by the learned Trial Court and the evidence of two material witnesses, namely the complainant – Tarang Gupta and his This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2026 at 11:21:54
BAIL APPLN. 2088/2026 Page 2 of 2 employee – Ayush, are to be recorded. The complainant has been summoned for recording of his evidence on 27.08.2026, and Ayush will be summoned for recording of his evidence immediately thereafter.
3. In this view of the matter, Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application, with liberty to the applicant to approach the learned Trial Court at the appropriate stage. However, he seeks a direction for expeditious recording of the evidence of the aforesaid witnesses.
4. The learned Trial Court is requested to record the evidence of the complainant and Ayush as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with its own Board and the age of the matters pending before it. Mr. Chauhan states that the prosecution will also cooperate in this endeavour, and will not take any adjournment.
5. The application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not made any comment on the merits of the case, which may be considered by the learned Trial Court in accordance with law, and all rights and contentions of the parties in any future application are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 5, 2026 SS/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2026 at 11:21:54