Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5628/2026 of DAVINDER KUMAR & ANR. Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR on 5 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010353832026 + CRL.M.C. 5628/2026 & CRL.M.A. 23535/2026 DAVINDER KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Akhil Gusain, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents

CRL.M.C. 5628/2026

$~92

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010353832026

+

CRL.M.C. 5628/2026 & CRL.M.A. 23535/2026

DAVINDER KUMAR & ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Akhil

Gusain, Advocates.

versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Ekta

Chauhan, PS-Mayur Vihar.

Mr. Lakshay Malhotra, Advocate

for R-2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

05.08.2026

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 129/2016 dated 10.03.2016, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi, under Section 354A(1)(iv) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes pursuant to a settlement.

2. During the course of hearing, respondent No. 2, who is the complainant, expressed her unwillingness to consent to the quashing of the impugned FIR. In view thereof, Mr. Sudhir Naagar, learned counsel This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2026 at 11:31:07

CRL.M.C. 5628/2026

for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties before the learned Trial Court.

3. Mr. Naagar, however, submits that the trial has remained pending for nearly ten years, and that both the petitioners are serving as government school teachers. He accordingly requests that the trial proceedings be expedited. In view of the aforesaid, the learned Trial Court is requested to consider the petitioners’ request for expeditious disposal of the trial, having regard to its own Board and the age of matters pending before it.

4. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 5, 2026 B/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2026 at 11:31:07

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead