Delhi High Court
W.P.(CRL)/2325/2026 of A Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. on 5 August 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010353782026 + W.P.(CRL) 2325/2026 A .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ansh Singh Luthra, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Ms. Priya
$~100
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010353782026
+
W.P.(CRL) 2325/2026
A
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Ansh Singh Luthra, Advocate
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with
Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Ms. Priya Rai,
Mr. Shubham Goyal, Mr. Aniket
Kumar Singh, Mr. Priyansh Raj
Singh, Advs.
SI Ranjana, PS Subzi Mandi.
Mr.
Puneet
Jaiswal,
Mr.
Sunil
Kumar & Mr. Kishan Jaiswal,
Advocates for R-7.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 05.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 23522/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2325/2026 & CRL.M.A. 23521/2026(interim direction)
1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is the complainant in FIR No. 594/2024 dated 09.09.2024 registered at Police Station Subzi Mandi under Sections 354/354A/376/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, seeks a direction for the time-bound completion of the further investigation and the filing of a supplementary police report.
2. Issue notice. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, learned Additional Standing This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 12:06:03
Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Mr. Puneet Jaiswal, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 7.
3. Mr. Tyagi, on instructions, submits that the investigation has been completed and the final report has already been filed. However, the matter is presently awaiting receipt of an additional Forensic Science Laboratory [“FSL”] report pertaining to the cloned data from the mobile phones of the concerned parties. The Investigating Officer [“IO”] is directed to pursue the matter with the FSL. It is expected that the requisite FSL report shall be furnished within a period of four weeks from today.
4. Mr. Tyagi further submits that upon receipt of the FSL report, the supplementary police report shall be filed before the concerned Court within a period of four weeks thereafter.
5. As no further orders are sought, the writ petition, alongwith pending application, stands disposed of.
6. Mr. Jaiswal, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 7, is also present. He submits that a petition filed by respondent No. 7 seeking further investigation is presently pending consideration before this Court. It is clarified that the present order concerns only the report already sought by the IO from the FSL, and shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any of the parties in any other pending petition. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 5, 2026/‘pv’/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 12:06:03