Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/8151/2014 of NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. Vs SURESH KUMAR on 5 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC012084322014 + W.P.(C) 8151/2014 & CM APPL. 18990/2014 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jawahar Narang, Adv. versus SURESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

$~34

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC012084322014

+

W.P.(C) 8151/2014 & CM APPL. 18990/2014

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

& ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Jawahar Narang, Adv.

versus

SURESH KUMAR

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

05.08.2026

1. The present petition has been filed stating that the learned Labour Court has created a new I.D. number to the dispute raised by the respondent.

2. According to the petitioners, by order dated 22.03.2011, the Central Government had referred the subject dispute for adjudication and the proceedings were adjourned for filing a statement of claim with relevant documents and list of relied witnesses. The dispute was numbered as ID No. 28 of 2011.

3. The petitioners are aggrieved that by a subsequent order dated 04.06.2013, a separate number (ID No. 58 of 2013) has been given to the said dispute and the respondent claimant was called upon to file its claim statement as the complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4. On being pointedly asked as to the prejudice caused to the petitioners, no satisfactory answer has been given. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2026 at 12:02:31

5. The present petition has been pending from last more than 12 years and it is pointed out that at some stage, the petitioner had also obtained the order of stay of proceedings before the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court.

6. Undisputedly, the complaint raised by the respondent workmen is pending consideration which will be decided in accordance with law.

7. I, therefore, see no reason to entertain the present petition as the same is clearly frivolous.

8. The petition is, therefore, dismissed with a cost of ₹30,000/- to be paid to the respondent within a period of four weeks. Pending application also stands disposed of. AMIT MAHAJAN, J AUGUST 5, 2026 “SS” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2026 at 12:02:31

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead