Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1365/2026 of BACHAN SINGH Vs MS. VISHAKHA YADAV on 4 August 2026
$~122 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010350752026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1365/2026 & CM APPL. 50515/2026 BACHAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta, DHCLSC counsel with Ms. Lavanya Bhardwaj and Mr. Akashdeep, Advocates with petitioner in person. (M): 9811046710
$~122
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010350752026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1365/2026 & CM APPL. 50515/2026
BACHAN SINGH
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Aditi Gupta, DHCLSC counsel
with Ms. Lavanya Bhardwaj and Mr.
Akashdeep, Advocates with petitioner
in person.
(M): 9811046710
Email: aditigupta29@gmail.com
versus
MS. VISHAKHA YADAV
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Avni Singh, Panel counsel,
GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma,
Ms. Harshita Raj and Ms. Sanskriti
Nautiyal, Advocates.
(M): 9958018998
Email: legal.avni@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 04.08.2026 CONT.CAS(C) 1365/2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 14th November, 2025, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 974/2024, titled as Bachan Singh Versus Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the said order dated 14th November, 2025, passed by the Division Bench, wherein, directions were passed in the following manner: “1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sameer Vashisht, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.
2. It has been informed that in response to the application made by the appellant seeking certain information, certain documents have been provided.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant however states that all the documents demanded by the appellant have not been provided. If that is so, the appellant can invoke the remedy of appeal under the Delhi Right to Information Act, 2001.
4. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the photocopy of the documents provided is not legible. In that eventuality, we permit the appellant to move an appropriate application seeking inspection of the documents.
5. Mr. Vashisht has stated that if any such application seeking inspection of documents is moved, the appellant shall be permitted to inspect said documents.
6. In view of the aforesaid, nothing remains to be adjudicated any further in this appeal, which is hereby disposed of.”
3. By referring to the aforesaid order, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the liberty granted by the Division Bench, an application for inspection of the documents was moved by the petitioner. However, no such opportunity has been granted to the petitioner till date.
4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent on advance notice submits that a notice dated 31st July, 2026, for inspection of the documents has already been issued to the petitioner. He further submits that as per the said notice for inspection, the petitioner has been called for inspection of documents on 07th August, 2026.
5. The aforesaid statement made on behalf of the respondent is taken on record, and the respondent is held bound by the same.
6. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
7. The present petition, along with the pending application, is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 4, 2026 c