Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1367/2026 of BACHAN SINGH Vs DEEPAK KUMAR on 4 August 2026
$~124 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010351142026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1367/2026 & CM APPL. 50541/2026 BACHAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta, DHCLSC counsel with Ms. Lavanya Bhardwaj and Mr. Akashdeep, Advocates with petitioner in person. (M): 9811046710
$~124
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010351142026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1367/2026 & CM APPL. 50541/2026
BACHAN SINGH
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Aditi Gupta, DHCLSC counsel
with Ms. Lavanya Bhardwaj and Mr.
Akashdeep, Advocates with petitioner
in person.
(M): 9811046710
Email: aditigupta29@gmail.com
versus
DEEPAK KUMAR
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Avni Singh, Panel counsel,
GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma,
Ms. Harshita Raj and Ms. Sanskriti
Nautiyal, Advocates.
(M): 9958018998
Email: legal.avni@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 04.08.2026 CM APPL. 50541/2026 (For exemption)
1. The present application has been filed seeking exemption from filing certified/typed copy of certain annexures, attached with the captioned petition.
2. Exemption allowed, subject to filing of the same, within a period of four weeks, from today.
3. Application is accordingly disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1367/2026
4. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 30th March, 2026, passed in W.P. (C) 3998/2026, whereby, directions were issued to the respondent herein to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 29th July, 2025, 29th August, 2025 and 05th September, 2025 within a period of eight weeks from the date of the said order.
5. Relevant portions of the order dated 30th March, 2026, read as under: “xxx xxx xxx
14. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of with a direction that the representations dated 29th July, 2025, 29th August, 2025 and 5th September, 2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3998/2026, and the representations dated 24th January, 2000 and 16th October, 2025 in W.P.(C) No. 4016/2026, shall be considered afresh by the concerned Consolidation Officer, or by such other competent authority as may be found appropriate in law. The said exercise shall be completed within eight weeks from today, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner and to any other person whose rights may be affected.
15. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the Petitioner in writing forthwith. If the Petitioner remains aggrieved thereafter, it shall be open to him to avail such remedies as may be available in law. xxx xxx xxx”
6. In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on advance notice, submits that the representations of the petitioner shall be considered and disposed of within a period of two weeks, from today.
7. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.
8. Accordingly, it is directed that the representations of the petitioner shall be considered by the respondent, i.e., the concerned Consolidation Officer, or by such competent authority as may be found appropriate in law, within a period of two weeks from today.
9. At the time of considering the representations of the petitioner, an opportunity of hearing shall also be granted to the petitioner or any other person whose rights may be affected.
10. Further, the decision shall also be communicated to the petitioner in writing forthwith, in terms of the directions issued vide order dated 30th March, 2026.
11. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition, along with the pending application, is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 4, 2026 c