Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./5487/2026 of AVININDER SINGH PURI Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 31 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010344292026 + CRL.M.C. 5483/2026, CRL.M.A. 22883/2026 & CRL.M.A. 22882/2026 AVININDER SINGH PURI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Bhullar and Ms. Gulnaz Khan, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
$~88 to 90
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010344292026
+
CRL.M.C. 5483/2026, CRL.M.A. 22883/2026 & CRL.M.A.
22882/2026
AVININDER SINGH PURI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. H.S. Bhullar and Ms. Gulnaz
Khan, Advocates.
versus
Through:
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the
State.
CNR No. DLHC010344302026
+
CRL.M.C. 5484/2026, CRL.M.A. 22885/2026 & CRL.M.A.
22884/2026
AVININDER SINGH PURI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. H.S. Bhullar and Ms. Gulnaz
Khan, Advocates.
versus
Through:
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the
State.
CNR No. DLHC010344342026
+
CRL.M.C. 5487/2026, CRL.M.A. 22892/2026 & 22891/2026
AVININDER SINGH PURI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. H.S. Bhullar and Ms. Gulnaz
Khan, Advocates.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:53:13
versus
Through:
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the
State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
31.07.2026
1. By way of these petitions, petitioner has assailed order dated 05.12.2024 of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, whereby the applications of the complainant/ITO under Section 311 CrPC read with Section 91 CrPC were allowed.
2. After addressing partly on maintainability of these petitions, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these petitions with the request for direction that the recalled witness be not permitted to prove on record any document other than those referred to in the applications under Section 311 CrPC read with Section 91 CrPC of the complainant/ITO.
3. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, making it clear that the recalled witness shall prove only those documents, which have been mentioned in the applications under Section 311 CrPC and Section 91 CrPC.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 31, 2026/ry
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:53:13