Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./5425/2026 of SAURABH SHARMA & ORS. Vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DEHLI AND ANR. on 31 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010341862026 + CRL.M.C. 5425/2026 SAURABH SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamal Jerath, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DEHLI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Mukesh Kumar. CORAM:
$~67
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010341862026
+
CRL.M.C. 5425/2026
SAURABH SHARMA & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Kamal Jerath, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DEHLI AND ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Mukesh Kumar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
31.07.2026
CRL.M.A. 22730/2026 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exception. CRL.M.A. 22731/2026 (for condonation of delay of 60 days in re-filing)
2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and delay of 60 days in re-filing is condoned. CRL.M.C. 5425/2026
3. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 380/2019 of Police Station Palam Village for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners.
4. At the outset, learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Mukesh Kumar This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:53:24
accepts notice and submits that trial has already commenced, in which the present respondent no.2 has already been examined and she has supported the prosecution case completely, therefore, inherent powers cannot be invoked to quash the FIR.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner on instructions of his clients seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
6. Accordingly, this petition and accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
7. It is made clear that this withdrawal shall not be read to the prejudice of the petitioners by the trial court.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 31, 2026/ry
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:53:24