Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./8419/2025 of SATISH BANSAL Vs STCI FINANCE LIMITED on 30 July 2026
& Connected Matter Page 1 of 2 $~59 & 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010940032025 + CRL.M.C. 8419/2025 & CRL.M.A. 35139/2025 SATISH BANSAL .....Petitioner versus STCI FINANCE LIMITED .....Respondent # CNR No. DLHC010940042025 + CRL.M.C. 8420/2025 &
CRL.M.C. 8419/2025 & Connected Matter
$~59 & 60
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010940032025
+
CRL.M.C. 8419/2025 & CRL.M.A. 35139/2025
SATISH BANSAL
.....Petitioner
versus
STCI FINANCE LIMITED
.....Respondent
CNR No. DLHC010940042025
+
CRL.M.C. 8420/2025 & CRL.M.A. 35141/2025
SATISH BANSAL
.....Petitioner
versus
STCI FINANCE LIMITED
.....Respondent
Appearance:-
Mr. Nitesh Mehra, Ms. Hitaakshi Mehra, Mr. Angel Bhardwaj, Ms. Prashansa Sharma & Mr. Aditya Prasad, Advocates for Petitioner in Item Nos. 59 & 60.
None for the Respondent in Item Nos. 59 & 60.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
30.07.2026
1. By way of these petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner assails summoning orders dated 29.05.2025, passed by the Magistrate’s Court in Complaint Case [NI Act] Nos. 6931/2025 and 6929/2025, instituted by the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and all consequential This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:52:12
CRL.M.C. 8419/2025 & Connected Matter proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Mr. Nitesh Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that these petitions have been rendered infructuous, in view of a subsequent order of the Magistrate’s Court dated 11.06.2026, by which cognizance has not been taken against the petitioner. The aforesaid order has been handed up in Court, and is taken on record.
3. In view of the above, the petitions, alongwith pending applications, are disposed of as infructuous. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 30, 2026 ‘pv’/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:52:12