Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2990/2026 of CHANDAN KUMAR Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) on 30 July 2026
2990/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages $~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30.07.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 2990/2026, CRL.M.A. 22569/2026 & CRL.M.A. 22570/2026 CHANDAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Samridhi Dobhal, Mr. Himanshu, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
$~68
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 30.07.2026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2990/2026, CRL.M.A. 22569/2026 & CRL.M.A.
22570/2026
CHANDAN KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Samridhi Dobhal, Mr. Himanshu,
Advocates
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Neeraj Kumar
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 674/2025 of Police Station Subhash Place, Delhi for offence under Section 318(4)/316(2)/3(5)/61(2)/112 BNS.
2. Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that he is the tenant of the office space, which space was being misused by the co- accused persons by running a racket for college admissions. It is alleged that the co-accused persons collected money from a number of persons, which GIRISH KATHPALIA
2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.30 14:16:51 +05'30'
was to the total tune of Rs. 57,00,000/- under the pretext of getting them admitted in a college in Mumbai, but no such admission was arranged and the co-accused persons even refused to return money.
3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that there is no legally admissible evidence against the accused/applicant, so he deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. It is also submitted that even according to prosecution, not a single penny was received by the accused/applicant. It is further submitted that the co-accused Kumar Gaurav has already been granted regular bail. It is also submitted by learned counsel that the anticipatory bail application of the accused/applicant was dismissed by the Court of Sessions on 16.07.2026 but thereafter till date, the IO has not issued any notice to the accused/applicant to join investigation, which shows that the custodial interrogation of the accused/applicant is not required. It is explained by learned counsel that since co-accused persons are friends of the present accused/applicant, he allowed them to use his office space for running property dealer office, but they misused the liberty granted to them.
4. Learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Neeraj Kumar accepts notice and fairly admits that apart from the disclosure statement of co-accused, there is no evidence against the present accused/applicant. However, the rent agreement of the office space has been collected by the IO. But as regards the contention that IO did not issue any notice to the accused/applicant to join investigation despite dismissal of anticipatory bail application by the Court of Sessions, no answer came from the IO except that now he shall GIRISH KATHPALIA
2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af 3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.30 14:16:39 +05'30'
issue the notice.
5. In nutshell, as on date, the only evidence against the accused/applicant is that his office space was misused by his friends, the co-accused person. To add to it, as mentioned above, the IO also does not seem interested in any interrogation of the accused/applicant. Admittedly, not a single penny out of the allegedly cheated amount was received by the present accused/applicant.
6. Considering the overall circumstances as described above, I find no reason to deprive the accused/applicant liberty.
7. The application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of his arrest, the accused/applicant shall be released on bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/SHO concerned.
8. It is also directed that as and when called in writing by the IO, the accused/applicant shall join investigation.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) JULY 30, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA
2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.30 14:16:24 +05'30'