Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./5384/2026 of DR KRISHAN LATA SHARMA Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. on 30 July 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010339022026 + CRL.M.C. 5384/2026 & CRL.M.A. 22577/2026 DR KRISHAN LATA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarang
CRL.M.C. 5384/2026
$~86
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010339022026
+
CRL.M.C. 5384/2026 & CRL.M.A. 22577/2026
DR KRISHAN LATA SHARMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP
Insp. Subhash Chandra, Cyber
Cell/Crime Branch.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
30.07.2026
1. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner – complainant assails impugned judgment dated 29.06.2026, by which the learned Sessions Court, in revision, upheld the charges framed against the respondent No. 2 – accused, under Sections 469/500 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”], but set aside the order of the learned Magistrate’s Court dated 11.03.2025, to the extent it directed framing of a charge under Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 [“IT Act”].
2. Mr. H.S. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that the learned Sessions Court ought to have considered whether the facts disclosed the ingredients of any other offence under the IT Act.
3. After some arguments, Mr. Sharma seeks permission to withdraw this This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:52:16
CRL.M.C. 5384/2026
petition, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the petitioner before the learned Magistrate’s Court, under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in accordance with law.
4. In view of the above, the petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not issued notice to respondent No. 2, and has not considered the matter on merits. In the event, any application is filed before the learned Magistrate’s Court, it is for the learned Magistrate’s Court to take an appropriate decision, in accordance with law.
6. Needless to say, all rights and contentions of the parties are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 30, 2026 ‘pv’/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 10:52:16