Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1809/2025 of PALLAVI SHARMA Vs SHRI KATIKITHAL SRINIVAS AND ORS on 28 July 2026
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1809/2025 PALLAVI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate. versus SHRI KATIKITHAL SRINIVAS AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana and Ms. Kritika
$~12
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1809/2025
PALLAVI SHARMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate.
versus
SHRI KATIKITHAL SRINIVAS AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC
with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Amit
Kumar Rana and Ms. Kritika Malik,
Advocates for UOI.
(M): 7455812281
Email: cgsc.ripudaman@gmail.com
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, SC, MCD
with Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocate for
MCD.
(M): 9810031680
Email: solicitor6@gmail.com
Ms. Shobhana Takiar, SC, DDA.
(M): 9810962950
Email: shobhana_takiar@yahoo.co.in
Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Panel counsel for
respondent no. 5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 28.07.2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 05th October, 2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 13024/2023, titled as Pallavi Sharma Versus Union of India and
Ors.
2. By way of the aforesaid order dated 05th October, 2023, directions had been issued to Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), for taking action against the unauthorised construction existing in property bearing no. G -53, Tower no. - 6, Gulshan Society, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, New Delhi- 110025.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent MCD submits that action against the unauthorised construction has been taken on various occasions. She draws the attention of this Court to the Status/Action Taken Report filed on behalf of the MCD, wherein, the action taken by the MCD on various dates has been detailed, in the following manner: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-MCD submits that further action has also been taken by the MCD on 22nd April, 2026 and thereafter on 07th July, 2026. She submits that after the demolition action, the said property has been re-sealed.
5. Considering the aforesaid, it is evident that requisite action has been taken by MCD.
6. MCD is enjoined upon to ensure that no further unauthorised construction takes place in the property in question.
7. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of.
8. However, Compliance Affidavit be filed by the MCD, within a period of four weeks. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 28, 2026 c