Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/829/2024 of AYUSH GAUR Vs SMT. BALESHWARI DEVI & ANR. on 28 July 2026
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 829/2024 & CM APPL. 44739/2026 AYUSH GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ridhi Kapoor, Ms. Shivranjini Sinha and Mr. Varun Parashar, Advs. Mob: 9910457636 Email: kapoorridhi30@gmail.com versus SMT. BALESHWARI DEVI & ANR.
$~28
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 829/2024 & CM APPL. 44739/2026
AYUSH GAUR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Ridhi Kapoor, Ms. Shivranjini
Sinha and Mr. Varun Parashar, Advs.
Mob: 9910457636
Email: kapoorridhi30@gmail.com
versus
SMT. BALESHWARI DEVI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Vijay Kasana and Mr. Vaibhav
Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 28.07.2026
1. The application being CM APPL. 44739/2026 has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 03rd February, 2026 passed by this Court.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the order dated 03rd February, 2026 passed by this Court, wherein, it had been directed as follows:
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a Receiver has been appointed by this Court for the purpose of filing appropriate application before the Noida Authorities on behalf of the respondents for effectuating transfer of property rights and execution of a Sale Deed in favour of the petitioner.
4. It is submitted that by way of the aforesaid order dated 03rd February, 2026, the Receiver has been directed to approach the Noida Authorities for the purpose of filing the requisite application. However, as per the procedure, the matter would travel to the Sub-Registrar of Noida, and thereafter, it would again be referred back to Noida Authority for mutation.
5. She, thus, submits that the Receiver, who has already been appointed by this Court, be also authorised for carrying out further procedure before the concerned Sub-Registrar, and thereafter before the Noida Authority.
6. The aforesaid clarification is accordingly granted and it is directed that the Receiver appointed by this Court vide order dated 03rd February, 2026 shall also be authorised to carry out further procedure before the Sub- Registrar, Noida and Noida Authority.
7. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the clarification given by this Court, the petitioner is satisfied.
8. Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 28, 2026 ak