Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1346/2024 of VED PRAKASH SONI Vs M/S. VIDYA PRAKASHAN MANDIR PVT. LTD on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1346/2024 VED PRAKASH SONI .....Petitioner Through: None. versus M/S. VIDYA PRAKASHAN MANDIR PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anuja Negi and Mr. Subhash Bhutoria, Advs. Mob: 8802006267 Email: anuja@iprlaws.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS.

$~29

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1346/2024

VED PRAKASH SONI

.....Petitioner

Through:

None.

versus

M/S. VIDYA PRAKASHAN MANDIR PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Anuja Negi and Mr. Subhash

Bhutoria, Advs.

Mob: 8802006267

Email: anuja@iprlaws.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 28.07.2026

1. The present petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the orders dated 22nd November, 2022 and 03rd March, 2023 passed by this Court in CS(COMM) 728/2022, wherein, the suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner.

2. By way of the said orders, the respondent was restrained from using the trademark ‘EVERSHINE BOOKS’, and was further directed to delist all the inventories from online market place and take down the website ‘www.evershinebooks.in’.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent draws the attention of this Court to the Compliance Affidavit dated 30th June, 2025, wherein, it has been stated as follows: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”

4. A further Affidavit of compliance has also been filed on behalf of the respondent dated 10th April, 2026, relevant portions of which, reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”

5. Thus, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that they have duly complied with the aforesaid orders passed by this Court and have not used the trademark ‘EVERSHINE BOOKS’ thereafter.

6. This Court notes that vide the earlier orders, the petitioner had stated that the product under the mark ‘EVERSHINE’ was still available on online platforms, i.e., Amazon and Flipkart.

7. Thus, directions were issued to the petitioner to file documents before this Court to show any active listing of the product under the mark ‘EVERSHINE’, by the respondent.

8. However, despite opportunities by this Court, no such documents have been filed by the petitioner.

9. Accordingly, considering the Compliance Affidavits, this Court is of the view that the orders dated 22nd November, 2022 and 03rd March, 2023 as aforesaid, stand complied with.

10. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

11. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 28, 2026 ak

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead