Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/133/2026 of RAGHVANDER SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR. on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 133/2026 RAGHVANDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Aggarwal, Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Mr. Ajayant Singh, Advocates Mob: 8447523211 versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mr. Sunil

$~3

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CONT.CAS(C) 133/2026

RAGHVANDER SINGH

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Rohan Aggarwal, Mr. Abhiyant

Singh, Mr. Ajayant Singh, Advocates

Mob: 8447523211

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with

Mr.

Sunil

KumarJha,

Mr.

M.S.

Akhtar

and

Mr.

Kushagre

Dixit,

Advocates for R-1

Mob: 9910770311

Mr. Vedansh Anand, SPC with Mr.

Sanjay Pal, GP for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 27.07.2026

1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 13th August, 2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 16779/2024, titled as Raghvander Singh Versus Union of India & Anr.

2. When the present petition was listed for hearing on 17th July, 2026, before this Court, the following order came to be passed: “1. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the order dated 13th August, 2025, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 16779/2024, wherein, following directions were issued: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”

2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though directions as contained in paragraph 6 of the aforesaid order have been complied with, however, the directions as contained in paragraph 7 are yet to be complied with.

3. Learned counsel for the Union of India (“UOI”), through Land Acquisition Collector (“LAC”) puts in appearance and submits that the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, has already been forwarded to the competent Court.

4. Accordingly, let requisite details be provided by learned counsel appearing for the LAC before this Court, on the next date of hearing.

5. Accordingly, re-notify on 21st July, 2026.”

3. Pursuant thereto, a Compliance Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein, it is stated as follows: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”

4. Considering the aforesaid Compliance Affidavit, it is evident that the order dated 13th August, 2025, passed by this Court, stands complied with.

5. Needless to state, the Reference Court shall dispose of the matter in an expeditious manner.

6. Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly, disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 27, 2026 ak

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead