Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/10214/2026 of SURESH KUMAR MISHRA Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

10214/2026 Page 1 of 4 $~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27th July, 2026 Uploaded on: 28th July, 2026 + W.P.(C) 10214/2026 SURESH KUMAR MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Aditya, Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms.

$~66

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 27th July, 2026

Uploaded on: 28th July, 2026

+

W.P.(C) 10214/2026

SURESH KUMAR MISHRA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Aditya, Mr.

Anjani Kr. Mishra, Ms. Pralika

Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms.

Srejal Mishra, Advocates.

versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND

ORS

.....Respondent

Through:

Ms. Arti Bansal ASC- MCD with Ms.

Shruti Goel Advocate.

Mr. Devvrat Yadav (S.P.C), Mr.

Manish Rawat(G.P) and Mr. Kartik

Sharma (G.P).

Ms Vaishali Gupta (Panel Counsel for

GNCTD) and Ms. Aanchal Rajput

Advocate for R-3.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from the vending site i.e., on the open space Madhya Marg, opposite booster pump, Tughlakabad extension, Central Zone, Ward S-82, New Delhi.

3. The case of the Petitioner is that he is a street vendor, who has been vending from the vending site for several years.

4. The Petitioner has been issued a Certificate of Vending (hereinafter, ‘CoV’) bearing URI No. 2171103 under the category of “Others” for Central Zone, Ward S-82. The Petitioner has been selling ready made garments on a mobile cart.

5. The photograph of Petitioner’s vend is placed on record. The same is set out below:

6. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he is not being allowed to peacefully vend his wares and is being repeatedly obstructed by the concerned officials of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Delhi Police.

7. Ld. Counsel for the MCD submits that the terms and conditions of vending makes it clear that the Petitioner has to be a mobile vendor.

8. It is further submitted by ld. Counsel for the MCD that the CoV of the Petitioner is in the category of “Others”, and the conditions which are applied to the vending are as under:-

9. The Court has considered the matter. The Petitioner has to strictly comply with the terms and conditions of the CoV and continue to operate as a mobile vendor. The Petitioner cannot stay at any particular place for more than 30 minutes.

10. Subject to above, the Petitioner’s vending activity shall not be disturbed.

11. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE

VIKAS MAHAJAN

JUDGE

JULY 27, 2026/MR/SM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead