Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1275/2026 of SMT SURINDER KAUR Vs SANJEEV KHIRWAR AND OTHERS on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1275/2026 & CM APPL. 47047/2026 SMT SURINDER KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pranjal Bhaskar with Mr. Neeraj, Advocates. (M): 7428545949 versus SANJEEV KHIRWAR AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Aarushi Tiku, Advocate for

$~37

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1275/2026 & CM APPL. 47047/2026

SMT SURINDER KAUR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Pranjal Bhaskar with Mr. Neeraj,

Advocates.

(M): 7428545949

versus

SANJEEV KHIRWAR AND OTHERS

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Aarushi Tiku, Advocate for

respondent no. 1 and 2.

(M): 9818931119

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 24.07.2026

1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 22nd May, 2026, passed in W.P. (C) 6470/2026.

2. Vide order dated 22nd May, 2026, directions had been issued to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) to take action against the unauthorised construction, as existing in the property No. 220, measuring 80 Sq Yds, Block, FA. Tagore Garden, New Delhi-110027.

3. In response to the present petition, learned counsel appearing for the MCD has handed over to this Court an order dated 02nd June, 2026, passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Appellate Tribunal MCD (“ATMCD”) in A. No. 479/2026. The said order is reproduced as under:

4. Reading of the aforesaid order makes it apparent that the learned ATMCD has directed that no coercive action be taken against the property in question till the next date of hearing, which is now 18th August, 2026.

5. Accordingly, no orders are required to be passed in the present petition at this stage.

6. Needless to state, as and when the occasion arises and the stay against the demolition action is lifted, the MCD shall take appropriate action against any existing unauthorised construction in the property in question.

7. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition, along with pending application, is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 24, 2026 c

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead