Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1277/2026 of VINOD KUMAR SHARMA Vs KANIKA on 24 July 2026
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1277/2026 & CM APPL. 47067/2026 VINOD KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Ms. Aditi Shivadhatri, Mr. Hemant Jain and Ms. Kushi Gupta, Advs. versus KANIKA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit, Adv. for MCD CORAM:
$~39
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1277/2026 & CM APPL. 47067/2026
VINOD KUMAR SHARMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
R.K.
Tarun,
Ms.
Aditi
Shivadhatri, Mr. Hemant Jain and Ms.
Kushi Gupta, Advs.
versus
KANIKA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Rohit, Adv. for MCD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 24.07.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 26th May, 2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6731/2026, which reads as under:
2. Upon reading of the aforesaid order, it is manifest that there were directions to the respondent-Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) to decide the representation dated 27th April, 2026, filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from thereof.
3. The present petition has been filed since the said representation of the petitioner still remains undecided.
4. In response, learned counsel appearing for the MCD submits that the representation dated 27th April, 2026, filed by the petitioner shall be decided expeditiously, and he shall be granted personal hearing before consideration of the said representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the MCD is directed to call the petitioner for personal hearing and seek all the requisite information/documents, as may be required, for the purpose of deciding the representation of the petitioner.
6. Thereafter, the MCD shall proceed to decide the representation of the petitioner through a speaking order, and a copy of the same shall be duly supplied to the petitioner.
7. Let the aforesaid exercise be completed by the MCD, within a period of three weeks, from today.
8. Needless to state, in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any non- compliance by the respondent, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court.
9. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of.
10. The pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 24, 2026/KR