Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/9336/2026 of SANSAD TV Vs SYED MHD IRFAN & ANR. on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24thJuly, 2026 + W.P.(C) 9336/2026, CM APPL. 43693/2026, CM APPL. 43694/2026 & CM APPL. 43695/2026 SANSAD TV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Mr. Lakshay Kumar, Ms. Manya Saxena, Advocates (M:9910148263) versus SYED

$~12

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 24thJuly, 2026

+

W.P.(C) 9336/2026, CM APPL. 43693/2026, CM APPL. 43694/2026

& CM APPL. 43695/2026

SANSAD TV

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Mr.

Lakshay Kumar, Ms. Manya Saxena,

Advocates (M:9910148263)

versus

SYED MHD IRFAN & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Zeyaul Haque, Advocate for Mr.

Syed Irfan

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he shall file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (“Gratuity Act”).

2. However, he submits that since the petitioner is already facing recovery proceedings, he may be protected for a period of two (02) weeks, so that the petitioner can approach the Appellate Authority.

3. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, in order to enable the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, and file the statutory appeal thereto, it is directed that for a limited period of two (02) weeks, the recovery proceedings, including the Notice dated 16th June, 2026, issued by the Assistant Collector Grade-II, Office of the District Magistrate, District New Delhi, shall remain stayed. Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:25.07.2026 16:56:38 Signature Not Verified

4. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, which shall be considered by the Appellate Authority.

5. Accordingly, all rights and contentions of the parties, including, the issue of limitation, shall be taken up by the Appellate Authority.

6. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition, along with the pending applications, is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 24, 2026/au Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:25.07.2026 16:56:38 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead