Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./1598/2026 of AJAY SEJWAL ALIAS SONI Vs THE STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI on 23 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1429/2026 & CRL.M.A. 11334/2026 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr Siddharth Batra and Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Advocates. versus STATE OF (NCT) DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Chinmaya K.
$~2 to 4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
BAIL APPLN. 1429/2026 & CRL.M.A. 11334/2026
SONU
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr Siddharth Batra and Mr. Chinmay
Dubey, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF (NCT) DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Complainant
(through
video
+
BAIL APPLN. 1595/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 857/2026
SIKANDAR SINGH TANDON
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Rajender Singh and Mr. Hiren
Sharma, Advocates
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Complainant
(through
video
+
BAIL APPLN. 1598/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 862/2026
AJAY SEJWAL ALIAS SONI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Rajender Singh and Mr. Hiren
Sharma, Advocates
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 11:53:51
versus
THE STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Complainant
(through
video
conferencing).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
23.07.2026
1. The accused/applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 409/2023 of PS Chhawla for offence under Section 306/34 IPC.
2. On being pointed out the contents of paragraph 7 of order dated 05.06.2026 in contrast with paragraph 6 of order dated 15.04.2026, both learned counsel for all these accused/applicants, on instructions, seek permission to unconditionally withdraw these anticipatory bail applications, so that they surrender and apply for regular bail. However, in case after surrender of the accused/applicants, the IO does not want to arrest them (which is the claim of learned counsel for accused/applicants but denied by prosecution side), it shall be obviously the prerogative of the IO.
3. As requested, the anticipatory bail applications and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that withdrawal of these applications shall not be read to the prejudice of the accused/applicants at the time of hearing their regular bail applications.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 23, 2026/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 11:53:51