Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./2202/2026 of JUGAL KISHORE RATNU Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2202/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2202/2026 & CRL.M.A. 17950/2026 JUGAL KISHORE RATNU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma and Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Advocates with Mr. Akshay Kumar, Mr. Preet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN. 2202/2026

$~83

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

BAIL APPLN. 2202/2026 & CRL.M.A. 17950/2026

JUGAL KISHORE RATNU

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Sandeep Sharma and Mr.

Jagjit Singh, Senior Advocates

with Mr. Akshay Kumar, Mr. Preet

Singh, Advocates.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP

with

Mr.

Narendra

Kumar,

Advocate.

SI Dipesh Malik, PS EoW.

Mr. Anoopam N. Prasad, Mr. Rajat

Singh and Ms. Gayatri Dahiya,

Advocates for Complainant.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

23.07.2026

1. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 78/2026 dated 10.04.2026, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi, under Sections 409/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant, has handed over orders of the Sessions Court dated 21.05.2026 and 26.05.2025, which are taken on record. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:04:34

BAIL APPLN. 2202/2026

3. After some arguments, Mr. Sharma seeks permission to withdraw this application.

4. Accordingly, the bail application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 23, 2026 ‘pv’/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:04:34

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead