Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1260/2026 of FRANKLIN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE Vs ANIL MITTAL on 23 July 2026
$~107 to 109 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1260/2026 FRANKLIN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Ruhil and Mr. Hammad Ali, Advs. Mob: 8010074443 Email: raj.ruhil@gmail.com versus ANIL MITTAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh and
$~107 to 109
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1260/2026
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Raj
Kumar
Ruhil
and
Mr.
versus
ANIL MITTAL
.....Respondent
Through:
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1261/2026
AAHWAAN INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Raj
Kumar
Ruhil
and
Mr.
versus
ANIL MITTAL
.....Respondent
Through:
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1262/2026
ST. JOHN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND PARAMEDICAL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Raj
Kumar
Ruhil
and
Mr.
versus
ANIL MITTAL
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 23.07.2026
1. The present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 14th November, 2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 16451/2025 and connected matters.
2. Vide order dated 14th November, 2025, the following directions came to be passed:
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite the categorical directions issued by this Court, the respondent has still not complied with the aforesaid directions.
4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the respondent, i.e., Pharmacy Council of India had filed a petition in the Supreme Court, being Special Leave Petition (“SLP”) (Civil), Diary No. 10989/2026.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that they have already moved applications, for withdrawal of the said SLP, before the Supreme Court, which is listed on 27th July, 2026. In this regard, the order dated 22nd July, 2026, passed by the Supreme Court, reads as under:
7. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order dated 14th November, 2025, passed by this Court, shall be duly complied with, upon withdrawal of the SLP from the Supreme Court.
8. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.
9. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the last date for giving the approval is 31st August, 2026.
10. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions, it is directed that the requisite approval in terms of the order dated 14th November, 2025 passed by this Court, shall be granted to the petitioners, within a period of two weeks, from today.
11. Needless to state, in case, the petitioners are aggrieved by any non- compliance by the respondent, the petitioners are at liberty to revive the present petitions.
12. With the aforesaid directions, the present petitions are accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 23, 2026/SK