Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/10054/2026 of UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs BANTY YADAV & ORS. on 23 July 2026
10054/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10054/2026, CM APPL. 46794/2026, CM APPL. 46795/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr.
W.P.(C) 10054/2026
$~86
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(C) 10054/2026, CM APPL. 46794/2026, CM APPL.
46795/2026
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey,
CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr.
Kritarth Upadhyay, Mr. Vivek Sharma and
Mr. Amulya Dev Mishra, Advs.
versus
BANTY YADAV & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
ORDER (ORAL)
%
23.07.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 10 December 2025 passed by the Tribunal in OA 3535/2024.
2. The lis before the Tribunal pertained to the entitlement of the respondent to out of turn promotion in terms of Standing Order L&O/17/2022 issued by the Delhi Police. The respondent was not found fit. However, while arriving at this decision, out of turn promotion vacancies for the year 2022 and 2023 were clubbed.
Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Date:28.07.2026 14:46:34 Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 10054/2026
3. The Tribunal has found, unexceptionably, that clubbing of vacancies was not permissible, and that the respondent’s case ought to have been considered against the vacancies available in 2022.
4. We do not find any cause to interfere with that decision, which is correct in law.
5. In so far as the directions contained in the impugned order are concerned, the Tribunal has not directed that the respondent should be granted out of turn promotion. All that has been directed is that his case should be considered against the vacancies available for the year 2022.
6. Needless to say, the petitioners are expected to examine the case of the respondent dispassionately, keeping in mind the applicable guidelines.
7. We, therefore, do not deem this to be a case to interfere with the impugned order.
8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
JULY 23, 2026/dsn Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Date:28.07.2026 14:46:34 Signature Not Verified