Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1255/2026 of PRADEEP Vs KISHOR MAKWANA on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 4 $~128 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1255/2026 & CM APPL. 46362/2026 PRADEEP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. (Through VC) Mob: 9990018670 Email: ashoklegalservices@gmail.com versus KISHOR MAKWANA .....Respondent

$~128

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1255/2026 & CM APPL. 46362/2026

PRADEEP

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. (Through

VC)

Mob: 9990018670

Email:

ashoklegalservices@gmail.com

versus

KISHOR MAKWANA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. Central Govt.

Counsel

Mob: 9971529687

Email: advocaetpsingh@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 26th May, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7489/2026, titled as Pradeep Versus National Commission for Scheduled Castes.

2. Vide order dated 26th May, 2026, directions had been issued in the following manner: “1. Mr. T.P. Singh, learned counsel, on instructions, submits that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes has taken cognisance of the petitioner’s complaint and has issued notices to District Magistrate and Deputy Commissioner of Police on 18.02.2026. Reminders were sent on 16.03.2026, 22.04.2026 and 19.05.2026. He, however, submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be looked into with due expedition. If the concerned noticees are not responding to the Commission’s notice, the Commission is fully empowered to take appropriate action against them. The non-cooperation of the concerned authorities, however, should not be the reason to delay the adjudication of the petitioner’s grievance.

2. In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that the petitioner’s representation be taken to its logical conclusion within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order passed today.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

4. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.”

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the petitioner’s representation has still not been decided by the respondent.

4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on advance notice, has handed over to this Court, a copy of the letter dated 08th June, 2026, issued by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, Government of India, which reads as under:

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner herein was granted liberty to file response to the report, as received from the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police (“DCP”), North District, Civil Lines. However, the said response has not been received from the petitioner as yet.

6. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall file response to the aforesaid report before the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, within a period of three days, from today.

7. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.

8. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that upon the receipt of the response from the petitioner herein, the date of hearing shall be fixed and opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the respective parties, including, the petitioner. Further, the requisite order shall be passed after hearing the parties.

9. He further submits that the needful shall be done, expeditiously.

10. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, the respondents are directed to comply with the order dated 26th May, 2026, expeditiously, within the time as granted vide the said order, i.e., five months from the receipt of the order.

11. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition, along with pending application, is accordingly disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 22, 2026/SK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead