Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1244/2026 of ANAND MOUDGIL Vs NIHARIKA SINGH AND OTHERS on 22 July 2026
$~113 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1244/2026 ANAND MOUDGIL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Moudgil, petitioner in Person. (Through VC) (M): 7696130000 Email: anand.moudgil@gmail.com versus NIHARIKA SINGH AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amish Tandon with Ms.
$~113
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1244/2026
ANAND MOUDGIL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Anand Moudgil, petitioner in
Person. (Through VC)
(M): 7696130000
Email: anand.moudgil@gmail.com
versus
NIHARIKA SINGH AND OTHERS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amish Tandon with Ms. Ria
Dhawan and Ms. Harshita Raj,
Advocates for respondent no. 2.
(M): 9899977720
Email: Harshita.raj@innovatuslaw.in
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 22.07.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 26th February, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P. (C) 14272/2025, titled as Anand Moudgil Versus State Transport Authority- Delhi.
2. Vide order dated 26th February, 2026, the following directions came to be issued: “xxx xxx xxx
5. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner’s application dated 11th June, 2024.
6. Issue notice.
7. Notice is accepted by counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.
8. In view of the limited relief sought in the writ petition, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within six (6) weeks from today, as per law. xxx xxx xxx”
3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent no. 2, who submits that he is appearing for one of the external members of the State Transport Authority (“STA”), Delhi.
4. He submits that after passing of the aforesaid order dated 26th February, 2026, the same was not communicated to the external members, who, therefore, were not aware of the present order.
5. However, he submits that six weeks’ time may be given to the respondents, and they shall do the needful, in terms of the order dated 26th February, 2026 passed by this Court.
6. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that the respondents shall comply with the order dated 26th February, 2026, passed by this Court within a period of six weeks from today.
7. Noting the aforesaid, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
8. Needless to state, in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by any non- action on the part of the respondents, he has liberty to revive the present petition.
9. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 22, 2026 c