Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/608/2024 of TRUSTLINE SECURITIES LTD Vs DAYA SHANKAR PANDAY on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 608/2024 TRUSTLINE SECURITIES LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Manjani, Adv. versus DAYA SHANKAR PANDAY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naman Jain, Adv. (DHCLSC), along with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI

$~21

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CONT.CAS(C) 608/2024

TRUSTLINE SECURITIES LTD.

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Hemant Manjani, Adv.

versus

DAYA SHANKAR PANDAY

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Naman Jain, Adv. (DHCLSC),

along with respondent in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 21.07.2026

1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 15th September, 2022, passed by this Court, in FAO 233/2019, wherein, a Settlement-cum-Compromise Deed (“Settlement”) dated 15th October, 2019, arrived at between the parties, was recorded.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in terms of the said Settlement, the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the respondent.

3. He submits that despite receiving the said amount, the criminal complaint pending in the Court Chief Judicial Magistrate (“CJM”), of Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, was not withdrawn by the respondent, on account of which, the present petition has been filed.

4. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 11:56:49

said criminal complaint has already been dismissed vide order dated 09th April, 2026.

5. The respondent Mr. Daya Shankar Panday, is present in Court. He submits that he is satisfied with the Settlement and he will not file any other case against the petitioner, which is subject matter of the Settlement dated 15th October, 2019.

6. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.

7. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 21, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 11:56:49

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead