Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./2057/2026 of HEMANT @ BUGGA Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2057/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2057/2026 HEMANT @ BUGGA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. SI Sumit, PS-Jagat

$~7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

BAIL APPLN. 2057/2026

HEMANT @ BUGGA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Mr.

Rajesh Sharma, Advocates.

versus

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.

SI

Sumit,

PS-Jagat

Puri.

ASI

Satender, PS-South Avenue.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 17.07.2026

1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 179/2024, dated 01.03.2024, registered at Police Station Jagat Puri, District Shahdara, Delhi, under Sections 356/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, has handed over status report in Court, which is taken on record.

3. After some hearing, Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the application. However, he submits that the Trial Court be requested to expedite the proceedings.

4. Mr. Chauhan states that 7 out of 12 witnesses have already been This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:07:50

examined, and the case is fixed for further prosecution evidence on 23.07.2026.

5. In this view of the matter, it does not appear that the case is unduly prolonged, however, the Trial Court is requested to take steps for expeditious conclusion of the proceedings, to the extent possible in accordance with its own Board and the age of matters pending before it. Mr. Chauhan assures the Court that the prosecution will cooperate in this process.

6. The application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 17, 2026 ‘B’/AD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:07:50

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead