Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./4897/2026 of ASHA RAM Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4897/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20551/2026 ASHA RAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kamaljot Kaur, Ms. Neelam Rajput, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Asmita, SI

CRL.M.C. 4897/2026

$~91

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.M.C. 4897/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20551/2026

ASHA RAM

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Kamaljot Kaur, Ms. Neelam

Rajput, Advocates.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP.

SI Asmita, SI Amandeep.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 17.07.2026

1. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 666/2014 dated 30.07.2014, registered at Police Station Najafgarh, District South West, Delhi, under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, on the ground that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have been amicably settled.

2. The terms of settlement are not discernible either from the petition or from the Memorandum of Understanding [“MoU”] dated 06.05.2026 annexed thereto. The only averment contained therein is that the parties have agreed to bring the pending proceedings to an end on the ground that their daughter’s marriage is not being finalised owing to the pendency of the disputes between them. Although Ms. Kamaljot Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner and This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:20:03

CRL.M.C. 4897/2026

respondent No. 2 have, in fact, reconciled, no such assertion finds place in the petition or the MoU, nor is it otherwise borne out from the record.

3. In view of the aforesaid, Ms. Kaur, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh, containing a proper recital of the relevant facts and accompanied by a MoU clearly setting out the current status of the matrimonial relationship between the parties.

4. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 17, 2026 ‘B’/MK/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:20:03

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead