Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/570/2021 of MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION Vs RAJESH KUMAR & ORS. on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

570/2021 Page 1 of 4 $~16 & 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13th July, 2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 570/2021 MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Mr. Sahil Gandhi, Ms. Sonali Singh, Ms. Kavya and Mr. Ankush, Advs. versus RAJESH

$~16 & 17

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 13th July, 2026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 570/2021

MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Mr. Sahil

Gandhi, Ms. Sonali Singh, Ms. Kavya

and Mr. Ankush, Advs.

versus

RAJESH KUMAR & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt.

Counsel, for R-1

Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta

and Mr. Ishan Srivastava, Advs. for

R-4 & 5

+

W.P.(C) 8900/2020, CM APPL. 28674/2020 & CM APPL. 3408/2025

MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Mr. Sahil

Gandhi, Ms. Sonali Singh, Ms. Kavya

and Mr. Ankush, Advs.

versus

CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT &

ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta

and Mr. Ishan Srivastava, Advs. for

R-4 & 5

Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, PC with

Ms. Purnima Jain, Ms. S. Taneja and

Mr. Madhur, Advs. for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 07th December, 2020 passed in W.P.(C) 8900/2020. The order dated 07th December, 2020 read as under:

2. Perusal of the aforesaid order shows that there was a direction that the gates of the colony in question, i.e., Sector-8, R.K. Puram Colony, shall remain open between 5 AM to 11 PM.

3. Today, learned counsel appearing for Residents Welfare Association

(“RWA”), i.e., the respondent herein, submits that gates in the colony in question remain open from 5 AM to 11 PM every day.

4. This Court notes that in the instant writ petition, the main prayer of the petitioner is as follows: “xxx xxx xxx

xxx xxx xxx”

5. Considering the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the RWA, it is noted that the grievance of the petitioner stands satisfied, as the gates of Sector-8, R.K. Puram Colony are stated to be open from 5 AM to 11 PM.

6. At this stage, this Court notes the submission made on behalf of the RWA that there are six gates in the Sector-8, R.K. Puram Colony, where security guards have been stationed by the RWA for the purpose of manning of the gates.

7. He further submits that the petitioner - Market Welfare Association, consists of shopkeepers who are running their commercial activities from the area in question, and therefore, should contribute towards the expenses incurred towards upkeep of the said gates.

8. This Court notes that the directions for opening the gates of Sector-8,

R.K. Puram Colony have been given primarily on account of the grievance raised by the Market Welfare Association, so that the ingress and egress of the various shopkeepers and their customers is not hindered.

9. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that the members of the Market Welfare Association are equal stakeholders in the matter, and are required to contribute to the upkeep of the gates in the Sector-8, R.K. Puram Colony.

10. Accordingly, it is directed that the members of the Market Welfare Association shall also contribute to the upkeep and maintenance of the six colony gates situated in Sector-8, R.K. Puram Colony, which would also include payment of salary of the security guards, who are stationed there to man the respective gates.

11. In this regard, the President/Secretary of the RWA, is directed to give the details of the expenditure borne by the RWA for the purpose of upkeep and maintenance of the colony gates. The President/Secretary of the Market Welfare Association shall ensure that 50% of the cost, as indicated by the RWA, is borne by the members of the Market Welfare Association.

12. It is further clarified that the contribution of the Market Welfare Association towards upkeep and maintenance of the gates shall be from the date of the present order.

13. With the aforesaid directions, the present petitions, along with the pending applications are disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 13, 2026/KR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead