Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1430/2025 of BVM ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs IMPERIA HEIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. on 13 July 2026
Page 1 of 7 $~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13th July, 2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025 BVM ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vedant Kapur and Ms. Anshika Saxena, Advs. Mob: 8377944021 versus IMPERIA HEIGHTS
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
$~6
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 13th July, 2026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
BVM ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Samar Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.
Vedant
Kapur
and
Ms.
Anshika
Saxena, Advs.
Mob: 8377944021
versus
IMPERIA HEIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. P.S. Bindra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.
Tushar Sharma, Mr. Sachin Jain and
Mr. Ram Pawar, Advs. for R-1 & 2
Mob: 9354124731
Email: tusharsharma133@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 24th June, 2025, passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in an application filed under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”), in the matter bearing Case No. DIAC/9857/12-24, titled as BVM Engineering Industries Limited Versus Imperia Heights Private Limited & Anr.
2. The relevant portions of the order dated 24th June, 2025, as passed by Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
the learned Sole Arbitrator, read as under: “xxx xxx xxx
3. Thus, by way of the aforesaid order, the respondents herein were Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
directed to resume the re-development and construction work at the site in question, in terms of the Principal Collaboration Agreement and subsequent Supplementary Agreements.
4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid order passed by the learned Arbitrator has attained finality, as the appeals against the said order already stand rejected.
5. Attention of this Court has been drawn to the order dated 25th February, 2026, wherein, certain timelines with regard to the work to be undertaken were noted. The order dated 25th February, 2026, passed by this Court, reads as under: Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
xxx xxx xxx”
6. Today, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite the aforesaid timelines, being noted by this Court on 25th Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
February, 2026, the respondents have failed to comply with the same.
7. Per contra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents has handed over to this Court, a copy of the Affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent on 11th July, 2026 in terms of order dated 07th May, 2026.
8. The said affidavit is taken on record.
9. By referring to the aforesaid Affidavit, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that admittedly, the timelines have not been met by the respondents.
10. In response, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the structure of the building in question is complete. Further, the re-development and construction work at the site in question, shall be completed by 31st March, 2027.
11. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not being granted access to the site, though he is the co-owner of the property.
12. In response, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner was interfering in the construction work being carried out at the site. However, the access of the petitioner to the site in question, has never been denied.
13. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, the undertaking on behalf of the respondents that the work shall be completed in terms of the Collaboration Agreement dated 10th July, 2013 and subsequent Supplementary Agreements, executed between the parties, by 31st March, 2027, is taken note of.
14. The respondents are held bound by the aforesaid undertaking.
15. It is further directed that the petitioner shall be granted access to the Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 1430/2025
premises, i.e., A-20, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044.
16. Further, it is directed that the petitioner shall not interfere in the re- development and construction work being carried out by the respondents, in terms of the Collaboration Agreement and subsequent Supplementary Agreement dated 26th May, 2022.
17. With the aforesaid directions, the present contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 13, 2026/SK Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified