Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/7177/2009 of RAM RAJ YADAV Vs THE KHATRI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7177/2009 & CM APPL. 35741/2024 RAM RAJ YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anup Kumar, Advocate along with Petitioner in person. versus THE KHATRI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. N.K.Bhatnagar, Mr. Arkam Khan, Ms. Gunjan

$~7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 7177/2009 & CM APPL. 35741/2024

RAM RAJ YADAV

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Anup Kumar, Advocate

along with Petitioner in person.

versus

THE KHATRI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN

BANK LTD.

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. N.K.Bhatnagar, Mr. Arkam

Khan,

Ms.

Gunjan

Ahuja,

Advocates.

Mr.Ramesh Chandra Purohit,

AR for the Respondent.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

13.07.2026

1. The present writ petition is filed challenging the award dated 18.07.2008 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Presiding Officer Labour Court XVI, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in ID No. 453/2006.

2. With the efforts made by the learned counsel for the parties, a sum of ₹1,00,000/- is offered by the respondent/Bank as full and final settlement and the same has been accepted by the petitioner.

3. The demand draft of ₹1,00,000/- dated 13.07.2026 bearing no. 001017, drawn on by The Khattri Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. has been handed over to the petitioner/workman in the Court today.

4. The petitioner, who is present in the Court, submits that he has no remaining grievance against the respondent. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:08:06

5. Considering the above, the present petition is disposed of as the disputes have been settled between the parties.

6. It is however made clear that the settlement arrived at between the parties has been effected in the peculiar facts of the case and through the efforts made by the learned counsel for the parties and the same shall not be treated as precedent in any other dispute of a similar nature.

7. Pending application also stands disposed of. AMIT MAHAJAN, J JULY 13, 2026 DU This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:08:06

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead