Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/265/2026 of KARAWAL NAGAR ROAD MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND VICE PRE Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS. on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 9 $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13th July, 2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026 KARAWAL NAGAR ROAD MARKET WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND VICE PRESIDENT SURENDRA PAL SINGH AND ORS & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tejas

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

$~4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 13th July, 2026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

KARAWAL

NAGAR

ROAD

MARKET

WELFARE

ASSOCIATION

THROUGH

ITS

AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVE AND VICE PRESIDENT SURENDRA PAL

SINGH AND ORS & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Tejas Singh and Mr. Saurabh

Dagar, Advs. (Through VC)

versus

MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION

OF

DELHI

THROUGH

ITS

COMMISSIONER & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Meherunnisa Anand Jaitley and

Mr.

Aryan

Tyagi,

Advs.

for

R-

1/MCD

Mob: 9717100486

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the directions, as contained in the order dated 16th January, 2026, passed in W.P.(C) 612/2026.

2. By way of order dated 16th January, 2026, the following directions had been issued:

3. In the last order passed on 31st August 2022, in W.P.(C) Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

12590/2022, this Court had disposed of the writ petition on the basis of the statement made by counsel for the MCD that if any demolition action is carried out, the same would be preceded by a show cause notice to the petitioners.

4. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD appearing on advance notice submits that at this stage, no anti- encroachment drive has been contemplated in the said area. In the event the respondent/MCD were to initiate an anti- encroachment drive, they would give a show cause notice to the petitioner and would act in accordance with the law.

3. Thus, perusal of the aforesaid order shows that there were directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) that, in case, any anti- encroachment drive is to be initiated by the MCD, they would issue a Show Cause Notice to the petitioners, and act in accordance with law.

4. This Court notes the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent-MCD that in the present case, requisite Show Cause Notices were issued on 08th May, 2026, to the petitioners herein, before the MCD initiated the work.

5. She submits that the work, which the MCD has initiated, was not in the nature of anti-encroachment drive, but for construction of Reinforced Cement Concrete (“RCC”) drain, as the shops of various petitioners were situated next to a drain.

6. This Court notes the submissions made on behalf of the respondent- MCD, as recorded in the order dated 16th February, 2026, passed in the present proceedings, in the following manner:

6. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present petition is thoroughly misconceived inasmuch as no action has been taken by the respondent [Municipal Corporation of Delhi Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

(MCD)] in wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the aforesaid order dated 16.01.2026 passed in W.P.(C) 612/2026.

7. It is submitted that all that has been done in the concerned area is to ensure that the work for construction of RCC drain (over a water body) is done in accordance with law. It is submitted that the said work is required to be completed pursuant to an award of a tender vide work order dated 11.11.2025.

8. It is submitted that the said work is in the nature of critical infrastructural work which is time-bound and is required to be completed within a period of six months from the date of issuance of the work order.

9. It is emphasized that it is only in connection with the work in question that the necessary construction activities have been undertaken. The same is only in the nature of a temporary impediment to access to the petitioner’s shop/s in the area in question.

(Emphasis Supplied)

7. This Court also takes note of the short affidavit filed on behalf of the MCD, the relevant portions of which, read as under: “xxx xxx xxx Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

8. This Court takes note of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the MCD that against the Show Cause Notices dated 08th May, 2026, the petitioners herein have already filed a Civil Suit, bearing No. 266/2026, titled as Premwati and Ors. Versus Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

9. This Court further takes note of the submission made on behalf of MCD that vide order dated 06th June, 2026, passed in the aforesaid civil suit bearing No. 266/2026, the said Show Cause Notices dated 08th May, 2026, issued by the MCD, have been stayed, and MCD has also been restrained from carrying out any encroachment removal programme for the Lal Dora Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

Properties, as mentioned therein.

10. The order dated 06th June, 2026, as passed in the said civil suit bearing No. 266/2026, reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

CONT.CAS(C) 265/2026

11. Accordingly, it is apparent that the MCD had sought to initiate action, pursuant to their project for covering of the drain.

12. Further, action for removal of encroachment was sought to be taken pursuant to Show Cause Notices dated 08th May, 2026, which already stand stayed.

13. Thus, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. However, needless to state, in case, the petitioners are aggrieved by any non-compliance on behalf of the MCD in future, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek their remedies, in accordance with law.

14. Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 13, 2026/SK Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:16.07.2026 16:41:50 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead