Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/7899/2026 of DHOOMI Vs NEW-DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. on 10 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7899/2026 DHOOMI ....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Adv. versus NEW-DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC, Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala Additional Standing Counsel, Mr. Soumit

$~6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 7899/2026

DHOOMI

....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Adv.

versus

NEW-DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL AND

ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr.

Sriharsha

Peechara,

Standing

Counsel

for

NDMC,

Mr.

Aditya

Bharat

Manubarwala

Additional

Standing

Counsel,

Mr.

Soumit

Ganguli, Ms. Ravicha Sharma, Ms.

Tanishka

Grover

and

Mr.

Akash

Sharma, Advs.

Mr. Chetanya Singh and Ms. Swati,

Advs. for NDMC.

Mr.

Vivek

Sharma,

Senior

Panel

Counsel

for

SHO,

Parliament

Street/R-3.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 10.07.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to conduct the survey of the Petitioner and issue the Certificate of Vending (hereinafter, ‘CoV’).

3. The case of the Petitioner is that he has been selling uncut fruits from a vending site near Shop No. 20, Barsurkar Market, near Yuwak Phal Sabsi Co- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:09:50

operative Society, since 1982-83.

4. On 31st July, 2025, the survey was concluded in the said area by the Town vending Committee. The case of the Petitioner is that he was unable to participate in the survey and hence, the prayer in the present petition is for his survey to be conducted and a CoV to be issued in his name.

5. On the other hand, Mr. Peechara, ld. Standing Counsel appearing for the NDMC submits that the survey in the said area has already concluded.

6. Heard. The Petitioner has admittedly not participated in the survey. The survey has already been completed in the said area in July, 2025. The NDMC is now in the process of constituting the Town Vending Committee-II.

7. At this stage, no fresh survey can be directed or be undertaken. If there is any future survey that is conducted, the Petitioner is at liberty to participate in the same, as per law.

8. No further orders are called for in this matter.

9. The present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J. JULY 10, 2026/dss/sm This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:09:50

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead