Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./1841/2026 of KRISHAN @ VISHAL Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) on 9 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1841/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1841/2026 KRISHAN @ VISHAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Neha Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivstava, APP Insp. Somvir Singh & Insp. Anand, PS Vikaspuri. Ms.

$~8

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

BAIL APPLN. 1841/2026

KRISHAN @ VISHAL

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Neha Mishra, Advocate.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Tarang Srivstava, APP

Insp. Somvir Singh & Insp. Anand,

PS Vikaspuri.

Ms. Nimmi Sinha & Ms. Sarita

Kumari,

Advocates

for

Complainant.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

09.07.2026

1. By way of the present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 512/2024 dated 16.10.2024, registered at Police Station Vikaspuri, District West, Delhi, under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. At the very outset, Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, submits that the complainant has not yet been examined before the learned Trial Court. He further submits that the other material witnesses are also yet to be examined.

3. In view of the aforesaid, Ms. Neha Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:12:12

this stage, without prejudice to the applicant’s right to approach the learned Sessions Court at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law.

4. The bail application, alongwith pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission.

5. It is, however, clarified that, in the event of any inordinate delay in the examination of the complainant or the other material witnesses, the applicant shall be at liberty to approach the learned Sessions Court in this regard. Any such application, if filed, shall be considered by the learned Sessions Court on its own merits, in accordance with law.

6. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on any application that may be filed by the applicant hereafter, which shall be considered by the appropriate Court on its own merits, in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 9, 2026 ‘pv’/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:12:12

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead