Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1008/2025 of SUMITRA SINGHAL Vs SH ASHWANI KUMAR & ANR. on 8 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~113 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1008/2025 & CM APPLs. 41785/2026 & 41786/2026 SUMITRA SINGHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rinku Yadav, Advocate. versus SH ASHWANI KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Chand Chopra with Mr. Shivam Bansal, Advocates

$~113

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1008/2025 & CM APPLs. 41785/2026 & 41786/2026

SUMITRA SINGHAL

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Rinku Yadav, Advocate.

versus

SH ASHWANI KUMAR & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Chand Chopra with Mr. Shivam

Bansal, Advocates for respondent no.

2.

(M): 9915907494

Email: chand@chandchopra.com

Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC with

Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu, Mr. Ravikant

Kumar and Mr. Vishal Sejwan,

Advocates for MCD.

Mr. Punish Garg with Mr. Sudhir

Chaudhary, Advocates.

(M): 9810031227

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 08.07.2026 CM APPL. 41786/2026 (For Exemption)

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), seeking exemption from filing certified copies of certain documents, annexures and orders.

2. Exemption allowed, subject to filing of certified copies of the said This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 16:57:17

documents, within four weeks.

3. Application is accordingly, disposed of. CM APPL. 41785/2026

4. The present application has been filed under Order I Rule 10, read with Section 151 of the CPC, on behalf of the applicant for impleadment in the present matter, on account of being the party against whose property, action has been taken by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”).

5. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that there exists unauthorised construction on the property of the petitioner as well.

6. If that be the case, liberty is granted to the applicant to seek remedies, in accordance with law.

7. Noting the aforesaid, the present application is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 8, 2026 c This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 16:57:17

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead