Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/1935/2026 of MAHESH @ VIKRAM Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) on 8 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~97 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1935/2026 MAHESH @ VIKRAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Manav Kaushik and Ms. Rishika Chaudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr.Alok Sharma

$~97

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(CRL) 1935/2026

MAHESH @ VIKRAM

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Manav

Kaushik

and

Ms.

Rishika

Chaudhary, Advocates.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with

Mr.Alok Sharma and Ms. Pavitra

Dixit, Advocates.

Insp Satish Kumar.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 08.07.2026

1. The petitioner, who is presently incarcerated in Central Jail No. 2, Tihar Jail, seeks transfer to a semi-open jail. For this purpose, the petitioner had earlier approached this court by way of W.P.(CRL) 3925/2025. By order dated 28.11.2025, the respondent was directed to consider the request of the petitioner for transfer to a semi-open jail, and pass necessary orders within four weeks. However, no order has yet been communicated to the petitioner.

2. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid, the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking transfer to a semi- open jail.

3. Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned Additional Standing Counsel for This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:55:24

the State, who appears on advance notice, states, upon instructions, that the petitioner’s transfer to a semi-open jail has been approved, and the transfer will take place within the next four weeks.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission, no further orders are sought in the writ petition, which stands disposed of. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 8, 2026 SS/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:55:24

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead