Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/8837/2026 of SANSAD TV Vs SANJAY KUMAR & ANR. on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~99 & 101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8837/2026, CM APPL. 41379/2026, CM APPL. 41380/2026 & CM APPL. 41381/2026 SANSAD TV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra and Ms. Manya Saxena, Advocates Mob: 9910385880 versus SANJAY KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents

$~99 & 101

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 8837/2026, CM APPL. 41379/2026, CM APPL. 41380/2026

& CM APPL. 41381/2026

SANSAD TV

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Jagdish Chandra and Ms. Manya

Saxena, Advocates

Mob: 9910385880

versus

SANJAY KUMAR & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Parvez Ahmad and Mr. Zeyaul

Haque, Adv. for R-Sanjay Kumar

(Through VC), along with respondent

in person.

+

W.P.(C) 8852/2026, CM APPL. 41475/2026, CM APPL. 41476/2026

& CM APPL. 41477/2026

SANSAD TV

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Jagdish Chandra and Ms. Manya

Saxena, Advocates

Mob: 9910385880

versus

AKHILESH KUMAR SUMAN & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Parvez Ahmad and Mr. Zeyaul

Haque, Adv. for R-Akhilesh Kumar

Suman (Through VC), along with

respondent in person.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 11:08:45

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 07.07.2026

1. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he shall file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (“Gratuity Act”).

2. However, he submits that since the petitioner is already facing recovery proceedings, he may be protected for a period of two (02) weeks, so that the petitioner can approach the Appellate Authority.

3. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, in order to enable the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, and file the statutory appeal thereto, it is directed that for a limited period of two (02) weeks, the recovery proceedings, including the notice dated 16th June, 2026, issued by the Assistant Collector Grade-II, District New Delhi, shall remain stayed.

4. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, which shall be considered by the Appellate Authority. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the present petitions, along with the pending applications, are accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 7, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 11:08:45

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead