Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./4615/2026 of GURMEET SINGH & ANR. Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4615/2026 & CRL.M.As. 19204-05/2026 GURMEET SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Mr. Abhishek Pandey and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

CRL.M.C. 4615/2026 Page 1 of 2

$~71

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.M.C. 4615/2026 & CRL.M.As. 19204-05/2026

GURMEET SINGH & ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Mr. Abhishek

Pandey

and

Mr.

Amit

Kumar,

Advocates.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr.

Deepankar Kataria, Advocate.

SI Naveen Kumar.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

07.07.2026

1. The petitioners are the father-in-law and sister-in-law of respondent No. 2 – complainant. They assail an order dated 24.01.2026, by which the Trial Court took cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in connection with FIR No. 238/2022 dated 11.02.2022, registered at Police Station Mandawali Fazal Pur, District East, Delhi. They also seek quashing of the said FIR, alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners before the Trial Court, including at the stage of arguments on charge and to seek discharge. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 10:46:25

CRL.M.C. 4615/2026 Page 2 of 2

3. Mr. Thakur also submits that, as the proceedings arise out of a familial relationship, the petitioners would like to make an attempt to resolve the matter mutually with respondent No. 2. He seeks a reference to mediation for this purpose. The petitioners may make this request before the Trial Court, where all the parties, including the parties to the marriage, will be represented.

4. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submissions.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open for adjudication before the Trial Court. PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 7, 2026 SS/MK/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 10:46:25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead