Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/700/2026 of SOHAN KUMAR Vs SANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (MCD). on 6 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 700/2026 SOHAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nupur Sachdeva, Adv. (Through VC) versus SANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (MCD). .....Respondent Through: Mr. Parminder Singh, SC with Mr. Aryansh Vaibhav, Advs. CORAM:
$~64
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 700/2026
SOHAN KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Nupur Sachdeva, Adv. (Through
VC)
versus
SANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF DELHI (MCD).
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Parminder Singh, SC with Mr.
Aryansh Vaibhav, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 06.07.2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 07th January, 2026, passed in W.P.(C) 160/2026, titled as Sohan Kumar and Ors. Versus Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through The Commissioner.
2. This Court notes that vide order dated 07th January, 2026, following directions had been issued: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2026 at 11:43:23
3. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) has handed over to this Court a Status Report, which is taken on record.
4. As per the said Status Report individual Speaking Orders have been passed, by the respondent.
5. However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner refutes the same, and submits that the said orders are not in the nature of Speaking Orders, and have been passed belatedly.
6. Accordingly, in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the Speaking Orders passed by the respondent, the petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedies, in accordance with law.
7. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly, disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JULY 6, 2026/KR This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2026 at 11:43:23