Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/423/2026 of M/S TECHNO COMPACT BUILDERS Vs RAILTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA on 29 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 423/2026 M/S TECHNO COMPACT BUILDERS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advocate (through VC) versus RAILTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Harshita Singh, Advocate for Mr. Mr. J.K. Singh with Ms.

$~19

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 423/2026

M/S TECHNO COMPACT BUILDERS

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advocate

(through VC)

versus

RAILTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Ms. Harshita Singh, Advocate for Mr.

Mr. J.K. Singh with Ms. Shivpriya,

Advocate

Mob: 8587840444

Email:

singh.harshita4321@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 29.05.2026

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) on behalf of the petitioner seeking extension of time for making the Arbitral Award in the matter of arbitration petition between “M/s Techno Compact Builders Versus Railtel Corporation of India” before the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of Sole Arbitrator Justice (Retd.) Kurien Joseph, former Judge of Supreme Court of India.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that final arguments have already been heard by learned Arbitrator lastly on 25th December, 2025.

3. However, it is submitted that the period for rendition of Award, as per This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:02:32

Section 29A(1) of the Arbitration Act, came to be expired on 04th September, 2025, which was extended with mutual consent till 03rd March, 2026, as noted in order dated 21st December, 2025.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the hearing dated 04th May, 2026, the learned Sole Arbitrator recorded that the Award was ready for pronouncement. However, it was noted that the time for rendition of Award had expired. Thus, the present petition has been filed seeking extension of time for rendering the Award.

5. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent, who submits that he has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

6. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that the time period from 03rd March, 2026 till today stands regularised.

7. Further, extension of three (03) months is granted to the learned Arbitrator, starting from today, for passing of the Award.

8. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J MAY 29, 2026 ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:02:32

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead