Delhi High Court
CS(OS)/88/2025 of AMAR NATH SHARMA Vs SUSHMA SHARMA AND ORS on 28 May 2026
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 88/2025 & I.A. No. 3878/2025 AMAR NATH SHARMA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohit Mittal, Advocate. versus SUSHMA SHARMA AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rishabh Singh, Advocate for defendant nos.1 to 3. Mr. Rishab Rajjain, Advocate for
$~3
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CS(OS) 88/2025 & I.A. No. 3878/2025
AMAR NATH SHARMA
.....Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. Mohit Mittal, Advocate.
versus
SUSHMA SHARMA AND ORS
.....Defendants
Through:
Mr. Rishabh Singh, Advocate for
defendant nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Rishab Rajjain, Advocate for
defendant no. 4 and 5.
(M): 9811079695
Email: rishab@rrjassociates.com
Mr. Deepanshu, Advocate for
defendant no. 6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
29.05.2026
This Case is being taken up today as 28th May, 2026 was declared as a holiday on account of ‘Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid)’.
1. The present suit has been filed seeking declaration, partition and permanent injunction with respect to the properties bearing no. F-105, Vikas Puri, New Delhi, and Flat No.7, Devdoot Apartment, DDA SFS Flats, D Block, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018 (“suit properties”).
2. As per the case of plaintiff, Late Sh. T N Sharma and Late Smt. Leela Devi Sharma, being the parents of the plaintiff and defendant nos. 4 to 6, died intestate. All the parties, i.e., the plaintiff and the defendants are related to each other, and are in possession of the aforenoted suit properties.
3. During the course of the proceedings, the parties made a joint request to refer the matter for mediation.
4. This Court notes that a Settlement Agreement dated 04th May, 2026 has been placed on record, as per which, the parties have settled their disputes.
5. Learned counsels appearing for the parties jointly submit that the parties have voluntarily entered into the said Settlement Agreement, and that the parties have given their free consent and executed the aforesaid Settlement Agreement without any force, coercion, undue influence or misrepresentation. Accordingly, they submit that the present suit be decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement.
6. This Court has perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement, wherein, it has clearly been stipulated as under: “xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx”
7. Perusal of the aforementioned Settlement Agreement shows that the same is lawful and the Court finds no impediment in accepting the same.
8. Therefore, with the consent of the parties, a consent/compromise decree is hereby passed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 04th May, 2026, and the following directions are issued in this regard: i. The parties are held bound by the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement, and they shall abide by the terms and conditions, as set out therein. ii. None of the parties shall raise any dispute with respect to the issues which have been settled by way of the Settlement Agreement dated 04th May, 2026.
9. Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties, which shall form part of the decree.
10. Let the decree sheet be prepared by the Registry, in accordance with the aforesaid terms between the parties.
11. With the aforesaid directions, the present suit along with pending applications, is accordingly disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J MAY 29, 2026 c