Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/7453/2026 of MURTJA Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. on 25 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 3 $~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7453/2026 & CM APPL. 36227/2026 MURTJA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu, Proxy Counsel. (through VC) Mr. Firoz Alam, Proxy counsel versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar

$~55

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 7453/2026 & CM APPL. 36227/2026

MURTJA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Renu, Proxy Counsel. (through

VC)

Mr. Firoz Alam, Proxy counsel

versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Adv.

Ms. Sweety Kumari, Proxy Counsel.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 25.05.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. Lawyers of the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) are abstaining from work today.

3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Murtja under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend at his designated spot i.e.,vacant land near pavement on the service road, near Gauri Shankar Mandir, Cycle Market Road, Chandani Chowk, City- SP Zone, Ward 84-N.

4. The Petitioner is holding a certificate of vending bearing number URI: 1692277 (hereinafter ‘CoV’) under the category ‘others’. The photograph of the vend has been placed on record, which is as under:

5. The case of the Petitioner is that he has been repeatedly disturbed by the Authorities and is not permitted to vend from his spot.

6. One of the conditions of the Petitioner’s COV is that he shall be a mobile vendor.

7. It is informed on behalf of the MCD that the Petitioner is vending in a no vending area.

8. If so, let the Assistant Commissioner, MCD of the concerned area identify a space from where the Petitioner can vend. Upon such location being identified, the Petitioner shall move there immediately and shall continue to vend from such spot.

9. Since the category of the Petitioner is ‘Others’, the Petitioner is permitted to run the vend at the vending site, strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the CoV.

10. The Petitioner shall also maintain proper cleanliness and hygiene in and around the cart which he is using.

11. The above stated directions shall be subject to any plan which the Town Vending Committee–II may be coming up with in terms of Section 21 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 and no vested rights shall be claimed.

12. So long as the Petitioner adheres to the terms and conditions of the CoV, he shall not be disturbed.

13. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. MADHU JAIN, J. MAY 25, 2026/ys/sm

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead