Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/7237/2026 of PAWAN KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA on 22 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

& 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7237/2026, CM APPL. 35413/2026 PAWAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sharang Dhulia, CGSC with Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv.

$~28, 29, 31 & 37

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 7237/2026, CM APPL. 35413/2026

PAWAN KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.

Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh

Bidhuri, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Sharang Dhulia, CGSC

with Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv.

with AC S.S. Thakur, Insp.

Sanjay Kumar, CT Sandeep,

CISF.

+

W.P.(C) 7239/2026, CM APPL. 35416/2026

RAMAN NAMDEV

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.

Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh

Bidhuri, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Mohit Bansal, CGSC with

Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Adv. with

AC S.S. Thakur, Insp. Sanjay

Kumar, CT Sandeep, CISF.

+

W.P.(C) 7242/2026, CM APPL. 35424/2026

SANDEEP KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.

Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh

Bidhuri, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr.

Piyush

Beriwal,

Ms.

Ruchita Srivastava, Advs. with

Through:

AC S.S. Thakur,

Insp.

Sanjay

Kumar,

CT

Sandeep, CISF.

+

W.P.(C) 7268/2026, CM APPL. 35541/2026

SEETENDRA KUMAR SINHA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.

Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh

Bidhuri, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Vinay Yadav, CGSC with

Ms.

Kamna

Behrani,

Mr.

Neeraj P. Raj, Advs. with

Through:

AC S.S. Thakur,

Insp.

Sanjay

Kumar,

CT

Sandeep, CISF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

22.05.2026

1. The only relief sought in the present batch of four Writ Petitions is for direction to the Standing Screening Committee to decide the candidature of the Petitioners, who have been selected for the post of Constable(GD)/Sub-Inspector (Fire) in Central Industrial Security Force („CISF‟).

2. The appointments of the Petitioners have been kept in abeyance in order to verify their antecedents, mostly on account of pendency or decision in criminal cases. The offer of appointment was issued to the

Petitioners on 24.01.2026, and they have been awaiting their joining for the last four months.

3. Keeping in view the aforesaid, and without going into the merits of the case, the present Petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Standing Screening Committee to decide the candidature of the Petitioners positively within a period of one month from today.

4. The pending applications also stand closed.

5. A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matters.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J. MAY 22, 2026 jai/ad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead