Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/7242/2026 of SANDEEP KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA on 22 May 2026
& 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7237/2026, CM APPL. 35413/2026 PAWAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sharang Dhulia, CGSC with Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv.
$~28, 29, 31 & 37
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(C) 7237/2026, CM APPL. 35413/2026
PAWAN KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.
Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh
Bidhuri, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Sharang Dhulia, CGSC
with Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv.
with AC S.S. Thakur, Insp.
Sanjay Kumar, CT Sandeep,
CISF.
+
W.P.(C) 7239/2026, CM APPL. 35416/2026
RAMAN NAMDEV
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.
Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh
Bidhuri, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Mohit Bansal, CGSC with
Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Adv. with
AC S.S. Thakur, Insp. Sanjay
Kumar, CT Sandeep, CISF.
+
W.P.(C) 7242/2026, CM APPL. 35424/2026
SANDEEP KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.
Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh
Bidhuri, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr.
Piyush
Beriwal,
Ms.
Ruchita Srivastava, Advs. with
Through:
AC S.S. Thakur,
Insp.
Sanjay
Kumar,
CT
Sandeep, CISF.
+
W.P.(C) 7268/2026, CM APPL. 35541/2026
SEETENDRA KUMAR SINHA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr.
Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh
Bidhuri, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Vinay Yadav, CGSC with
Ms.
Kamna
Behrani,
Mr.
Neeraj P. Raj, Advs. with
Through:
AC S.S. Thakur,
Insp.
Sanjay
Kumar,
CT
Sandeep, CISF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
22.05.2026
1. The only relief sought in the present batch of four Writ Petitions is for direction to the Standing Screening Committee to decide the candidature of the Petitioners, who have been selected for the post of Constable(GD)/Sub-Inspector (Fire) in Central Industrial Security Force („CISF‟).
2. The appointments of the Petitioners have been kept in abeyance in order to verify their antecedents, mostly on account of pendency or decision in criminal cases. The offer of appointment was issued to the
Petitioners on 24.01.2026, and they have been awaiting their joining for the last four months.
3. Keeping in view the aforesaid, and without going into the merits of the case, the present Petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Standing Screening Committee to decide the candidature of the Petitioners positively within a period of one month from today.
4. The pending applications also stand closed.
5. A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matters.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J. MAY 22, 2026 jai/ad