Armed Forces Tribunal
Ex LNk Subhas Chand (Army) vs UOI & Others on 3 December 2025
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
14.
OA 227/2020 with MA 87/2020
Ex L/Nk Subhas Chand
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Mr. Yogendra Singh, Sunil Kumar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pradeep Mathur, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
03.12.2025
1. During the course of hearing, while Counsel for the Applicant sought adjournment on the ground that he has not received a copy of the Reply Statement filed by the Respondents, Counsel for the Respondents submits that this Application is a frivolous one as relief has already been extended to the Applicant.
2. Perusal of record reveals that vide Reply Statement, the Respondents have stated that Disaility Element of Disability Pension @20% duly rounded off to 50% has already been granted to the Applicant for life vide PPO dated 05/10/2005, who is also in receipt of service pension for life wef 01/1/2003.
3. In view of relief having been granted to the Applicant, we consider this Application as infructuous and the OA is dismissed as infructuous.
4. File be consigned to record. Counsel for the Respondents is directed to supply a copy of the Reply Statement to the Counsel for the Applicant within a period of seven days. We make it clear that in case applicant has any grievance
2
with regard to relief already extended to him way back in 2005, he shall be at liberty to approach this Tribunal de novo.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J) cda/-